You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

fortyeridania comments on Is it immoral to have children? - Less Wrong Discussion

15 Post author: jkaufman 22 October 2013 12:13PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (317)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: fortyeridania 22 October 2013 05:35:24PM 4 points [-]

I think this is a feature of any moral system wherein maximization of something is the standard of morality.

Comment author: [deleted] 22 October 2013 10:17:06PM 2 points [-]

Yes, if the goal is only to maximize a particular good, then everything else must be sacrificed to it. That is the beauty of maximizing utility, which does not specify anything in particular. Thus it only demands that lesser utilities be foregone in order to obtain greater utilities, which is hardly counterintuitive.

Comment author: Lumifer 22 October 2013 06:50:19PM 3 points [-]

Feature or misfeature?

Comment author: fortyeridania 24 October 2013 01:31:26AM 4 points [-]

I just meant "characteristic".

Comment author: Ishaan 23 October 2013 03:24:36AM *  1 point [-]

Not true.

It's just that maximizing your preferences (having children, going to starbucks, whatever) is often at odds with maximizing the subset of your preferences which you identify under the category "moral". This example only seems single-minded because moral preferences are just a small subset of all your preferences.

If you strive to maximize all of your preferences (which is what you are striving for anyhow, in theory) rather than a limited subset called "morality", you'll see that every action which you would prefer to take is in fact the action which will best maximize your preference function.