You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Brillyant comments on [Meta] The Decline of Discussion: Now With Charts! - Less Wrong Discussion

43 Post author: Gavin 04 June 2014 10:02PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (105)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Brillyant 06 June 2014 02:05:56PM 2 points [-]

Shelly Kagen was helpful to me in being more accepting of death.

I grew up Evangelical Christian and I'm often fascinated by what I view as a case of something like death denial in the LW/cryonics/transhumanism crowd. It reminds me of the people I knew who embraced religion as a death transcendence mechanism.

should accept death as a neutral or positive thing

There is gratuitous pain that often accompanies the dying process. Plus, loved ones will miss you—that sucks. But "death" is just a transition to non-existence. If you stop existing—and are unaware of your non-existence—that seems utterly neutral by any measure. (The only counterargument I remember is some sort opportunity cost plea whereby staying alive allows you to accumulate more utilons and fuzzies...therefore death = bad.)

Further, from a evolutionary standpoint, it seems we should be aware that the bias against death is likely extremely strong, since any species without a strong "anti-death" drive likely died out. It's part of the reason it irked me about LW that some argued so vehemently that death is rationally bad.