You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

ciphergoth comments on Open thread, 9-15 June 2014 - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: Tenoke 09 June 2014 01:07PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (239)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: ciphergoth 14 June 2014 08:30:16AM 4 points [-]

GHash.io reaching 51% is somewhat surprising. It seems that one of three unlikely-sounding situations hold:

  • The controllers of GHash.io don't think this will have a strongly negative effect on the value of Bitcoin
  • The controllers of GHash.io don't mind if this has a strongly negative effect on the value of Bitcoin
  • The controllers of GHash.io are somehow unable to think clearly enough or act with enough coordination to protect their own self interest.

Any guesses?

Comment author: David_Gerard 14 June 2014 08:35:19AM *  1 point [-]

Not that surprising - I recall people were worrying about this when they were at 45%.

Mostly I'm seeing Bitcoin enthusiasts upset that Bitcoin now has a central bank - that it's no longer decentralised and therefore the point is gone.

How's this on the issues?