You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Ander comments on [Link] How to see into the future (Financial Times) - Less Wrong Discussion

6 Post author: fortyeridania 07 September 2014 06:04AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (13)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Ander 08 September 2014 09:59:28PM 1 point [-]

My inside perspective from using this system is that, at least the way we use it, it is not useful for forecasting. In each sprint approximately 40-50% or so of the tasks actually get finished. Most of the rest we carry over, and occasionally a few will be deprioritized and removed.

The points values are not used very systematically. Some items aren't even assigned a point value. For those that are, the values do generally tend to correspond to amounts of effort of 'a day', 'a week', or 'a month', but not with very much precision.

We certainly don't focus on whether or not our points predictions were accurate to the amount of time actually taken during retrospectives. I think that in the past 12 months, all but one or two of our retrospectives have ended up being cancelled, because they aren't seen as very important.

Probably we are not utilizing this system to its fullest capacity, but our group isn't dysfuncitonal or anything. The system seems to work pretty well as a management tool for us (but is not so useful for forecasting!).