You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

ChristianKl comments on Open thread, Oct. 6 - Oct. 12, 2014 - Less Wrong Discussion

6 Post author: MrMind 06 October 2014 08:16AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (332)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ChristianKl 11 October 2014 11:31:16AM 1 point [-]

How many online community are there that considers outsiders to be high status to an extend that the highest rated post is by an outsider?

Comment author: Risto_Saarelma 11 October 2014 12:40:24PM *  0 points [-]

It's about a surrounding society's measure of status, not about the community's. Celebrity-outsiders (high status on the outside, indeterminate status on the inside) dropping in at Reddit often get a very positive reception for example. Random-person-outsiders (indeterminate status both outside and inside) get the random person outsider reception. The drop-in celebrities at Reddit probably don't net the top ratings for the whole site, given how Reddit is huge, but a small forum that doesn't have that much inside vote activity could easily end up treating an interesting high outside status person dropping in as the most interesting event in the forum history.

Comment author: ChristianKl 11 October 2014 01:16:51PM 2 points [-]

It's about a surrounding society's measure of status, not about the community's.

I don't think Holden Karnofsky is high status as far as society goes. Outside of people with interest in Effective Altruism he's just a random person running an NGO.

Comment author: Risto_Saarelma 11 October 2014 01:51:09PM 1 point [-]

Social status has many dimensions. Credible professionalism and a position to affect an organization with notable resources and visibility are pretty robust ones.

Comment author: ChristianKl 11 October 2014 09:07:59PM 3 points [-]

Givewell has 1 million in revenue per year. There are plenty of organisations of that size. I don't think it's a large amount of resources.