You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

skeptical_lurker comments on Open thread, Jan. 26 - Feb. 1, 2015 - Less Wrong Discussion

6 Post author: Gondolinian 26 January 2015 12:46AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (431)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: skeptical_lurker 28 January 2015 09:45:18PM 0 points [-]

Well, I had a transgender friend who said that at a trans meeting two types of people turned up: those that didn't strongly identify as either gender, and those that strongly identified as the gender opposite to their physical body. This is the distinction I am trying to describe.

And "agender trans people" is quite a mouthful.

Comment author: falenas108 29 January 2015 02:47:35AM 0 points [-]

You can just say "non-binary people" or "agender people." In any case, binary and non-binary are the types you are talking about.