You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Manfred comments on Open Thread, Feb. 2 - Feb 8, 2015 - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: Gondolinian 02 February 2015 12:28AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (253)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Manfred 03 February 2015 02:40:47AM *  1 point [-]

Not OK in what sense - as in morally wrong to kill sapient beings or as terrifying as getting killed?

The first one - they're just a close relative :)

I don't quite get this part - can you elaborate?

TDT says to treat the world as a causal diagram that has as its input your decision algorithm, and outputs (among other things) whether you're a copy (at least, iff your decision changes how many copies of you there are). So you should literally evaluate the choices as if your action controlled whether or not you are a copy.

As to erasing memories - yeah I'm not sure either, but I'm learning towards it being somewhere between "almost a causal descendant" and "about as bad as being killed and a copy from earlier being saved."

Comment author: maxikov 03 February 2015 06:33:57PM 0 points [-]

OK, I'll have to read deeper into TDT to understand why that happens, currently that seems counterintuitive as heck.