You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

D_Malik comments on Open thread, Mar. 23 - Mar. 31, 2015 - Less Wrong Discussion

6 Post author: MrMind 23 March 2015 08:38AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (181)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: D_Malik 28 March 2015 08:39:07PM *  0 points [-]

I'm planning to get a BS and then an MS in computer science. To get the BS I have to take a certain number of course units, much more than is actually needed to fulfill the BS's requirements, and I'm not entirely sure what to fill those extra units with.

Which of these is more impressive?

  • A 2nd major in economics.
  • A 2nd major in management engineering.
  • 2 minors in any 2 of:
    • statistics
    • economics
    • management engineering
    • mathematics
Comment author: Larks 28 March 2015 11:45:23PM 2 points [-]
  • Major in Economics
  • Minor in Maths/Stats
  • Minor in Econ
  • Major in Management Engineering
  • Minor in Management Engineering

I don't know exactly what management engineering is but it sounds like a made up subject.

Comment author: D_Malik 29 March 2015 12:34:06AM 1 point [-]

Thanks!

Management engineering is things like optimization, stochastic modelling, and organization theory. I agree it might sound like a way of weaseling out of taking difficult courses.

Comment author: [deleted] 30 March 2015 09:51:21AM 1 point [-]

The main question is who you are trying to impress - what are your goals beyond getting an MS in computer science? or stated otherwise, why MS in computer science?

My perspective from academia: a second major signifies a certain level of dedication to a subject -- which can work for you or against you depending on the next step you plan to take. Discipline prejudices are very real, and in some cases exist for good reasons. for example, management engineering can be very beneficial if you are heading toward a technical management role (in certain kinds of companies) but can work against you if this is not your intent.

And minors: I pretty much ignore them, instead looking at the portfolio of classes a student has taken, and much more importantly, why. It is much more important to me to see that a student had some coherent plan for courses taken, than whether they conform to a university's designation of "minor" or not. So: the more coherent the better (but no need to apologise for optional classes that are obviously just for fun or personal interest).

Comment author: D_Malik 31 March 2015 05:25:33PM 0 points [-]

Thanks for the feedback! I'm intending to go into industry, not academia, but this is still helpful.