= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Gunnar_Zarncke comments on Open thread, Apr. 01 - Apr. 05, 2015 - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (179)
I'm considering to make a poll post for value judgements. Questions would include the trolly one, comparison of saving a human life vs. 10, 1000, a million animals (of differnent kinds) and others. has this been done? Where? Do you have recommendations for such?
I googled for empirical ethics but didn't turn up anything that asking for value judgements online. Do you know anything about this?
My interest was spurred by a discussion that left this part out. My motivation is mainly to get some (non-representative) sample of such value judgements. Could be interesting for limits on the breath of the complexity of value question.
There's the World Value survey: http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/wvs.jsp
Interesting site. And interesting map: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inglehart%E2%80%93Welzel_cultural_map_of_the_world I wouldn't have expected such a clustering.
The questions asked in that surveys include only a small fraction of the ethical decisions I have in mind. Some which ask for specific choices are included e.g. the sections "Justified: *" and "Would not like to have as neighbors: *".
But actually I didn't mean an online viewer for results but and online survey.