= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
tailcalled comments on On the Boxing of AIs - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (8)
There are other reasons than to check if the AI is friendly. AI, like other software, would have to be tested pretty thoroughly. It would be hard to make an AI if we can't test it without destroying the world.
Isn't that only a subcase of friendliness testing?
Not really. If you have an AI where you're not sure if it is completely broken or just unfriendly, you might want to test it, but without proper boxing you still risk destroying the world in the unlikely case that the AI works.