You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Nornagest comments on Open Thread, Apr. 06 - Apr. 12, 2015 - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: philh 06 April 2015 02:18PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (128)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ChristianKl 09 April 2015 12:33:04PM 2 points [-]

There is no vaccine against the common cold.

Ah, you are right. Still there's a flu vaccine.

I'm not sure that the heated salt is hot enough to be worrisome. What ill effects do you think are likely?

I don't have specific concerns, but in general heating up a region under pain seems to be an idea that could be within standard medicine and it doesn't seem to be standard practice.

If it would be useful, why is there no big pharma company that sells a creme that heats up ears and markets it?

Comment author: Nornagest 09 April 2015 05:30:35PM *  1 point [-]

I've never heard of the salt/ear thing, but warm compresses are fairly standard advice for certain types of eye infections. I believe the main goal there is less to increase blood circulation and more to soften oils that might be blocking the glands in the area, though.

Physical heating is something that pharma companies aren't really equipped to monopolize, but I have seen microwavable hot/cold packs. They don't seem to offer much advantage over a warm towel.