You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Viliam comments on Open Thread, Apr. 06 - Apr. 12, 2015 - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: philh 06 April 2015 02:18PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (128)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Viliam 13 April 2015 10:18:35AM *  0 points [-]

I don't know if this could be relevant, but some cultures have a religion that allows them to eat vegetables and fish. Some branches of Buddhism, if I remember correctly. Thus less people motivated to work on fish replacements.

Comment author: Elo 16 April 2015 12:11:16PM 0 points [-]

if you consider ranking living things by their capacity to feel or understand pain, you end up with fish being lower than large land animals. Also humans more often can develop relationships with land animals than fish, while we can develop relationships i.e. with dolfins; we don't eat them often.

Comment author: ChristianKl 14 April 2015 10:02:45PM 0 points [-]

Some branches of Buddhism, if I remember correctly.

Wikipedia seems to describe it that way: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhist_vegetarianism