DeVliegendeHollander comments on Open Thread, Apr. 13 - Apr. 19, 2015 - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (319)
Wait, what?! There are some bad evo psy, especially the "pop", not actually peer reviewed kind, but to write off the whole discipline... I mean, are you aware it is mostly just about getting ideas from evolution, but their experimental testing is with the methods of "normal" mainstream psychology? This is precisely what the article talks about. After they got these ideas, they tested them with normal psychological tests.