Evo psyc is always bullshit,
Wait, what?! There are some bad evo psy, especially the "pop", not actually peer reviewed kind, but to write off the whole discipline... I mean, are you aware it is mostly just about getting ideas from evolution, but their experimental testing is with the methods of "normal" mainstream psychology? This is precisely what the article talks about. After they got these ideas, they tested them with normal psychological tests.
If it's worth saying, but not worth its own post (even in Discussion), then it goes here.
Notes for future OT posters:
1. Please add the 'open_thread' tag.
2. Check if there is an active Open Thread before posting a new one. (Immediately before; refresh the list-of-threads page before posting.)
3. Open Threads should be posted in Discussion, and not Main.
4. Open Threads should start on Monday, and end on Sunday.