You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

RowanE comments on Open Thread, Apr. 13 - Apr. 19, 2015 - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: Gondolinian 13 April 2015 12:19AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (319)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: advancedatheist 16 April 2015 05:55:00PM *  -2 points [-]

Will romance novelists in the 24th Century write novels featuring virile, "real men" characters in the 21st Century who show up the inadequacies of 24th Century guys?

Comment author: RowanE 17 April 2015 12:19:41PM 0 points [-]

I'm not sure about "who show up the inadequacies of 24th century guys", but romanticising history is present in any society that has history, and androsexual people who prefer manly men are sure to romanticise whatever manly archetypes existed in or can be invented for that age, so at least the first half of that seems inevitable as long as "romance novelist " is still a concept that exists in C24, and they know that gangster rap culture was a thing.

Why do you ask? It seems like just gender-issue-baiting.