= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
jacob_cannell comments on Could you tell me what's wrong with this? - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (64)
Just a little nitpick here, but your last statement is unlikely. There are actual computer systems that are completely unhackable even by any team of skilled security researchers (non-networked devices, etc).
Of course, the generalization of your point is much more likely, but the likely forms of AI takeover probably involve a diverse set of skills, including subtle and complex strategic social/cultural manipulations. Human brains are more hackable than many computer systems in this regard.
I did use the word "available" as a qualifier. Some airgapped computers don't qualify as available. But 100% isn't required.
I consider it politically impossible to shut down all nonairgapped computers. Taking away computers creates civil war and in civil war computers are useful to win conflicts. The AGI just has to stay alive and self improve.
For an AGI hacking a great number of computers allows the AGI to use those computers to
Only if you limit 'hacking' to networking and don't include things like social engineering, blackmailing and physical attack/intrusion.