= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
halcyon comments on Open Thread, May 25 - May 31, 2015 - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (301)
Do you claim the following proposition is true: Every state where hate speech has been forbidden has been a horrible police state.
There is not much reason to fight strawmen.
"Hate speech" is not a term that characterizes the speech itself, it's a term that expresses the speaker's attitude towards that particular speech. May I recommend a blog post?
For the purposes of this argument, I define hate speech as X such that X is a member of set S. (see my other comment)