= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
adamzerner comments on Ideas to Improve LessWrong - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (30)
My impression is just that people are much less inclined to do so than they would be if there was a section explicitly for project ideas. And that it's less organized.
Very cool. I actually signed up for dotimpact a while ago, but have forgotten about it. Given the existence of dotimpact, I'm now not so sure whether it's worth having a separate place on LW for it. My first thoughts are:
1) It's worth linking to dotimpact. My thinking is that helping people on LW coordinate on projects has the potential to be a very impactful high level action.
2) It still seems worth it to have a section/thread for project discussions on LW.
Good point. I feel slightly stupid :) I'm not sure what my point is there or whether it's valid. I'm just envisioning it on LW and it feeling cool.
Live/Realtime chat is a definite possibility.
Tools like hangouts/slack are the next generation of social interactions and I am already in a few groups based around those systems. The trick is finding the right interface to make it work. (the two mentioned seem to work okay)
Creating additional sections increases complexity. Creating additional section for things that could be solved via a thread in discussion or a Wiki page, seem like a bad idea to me.