You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

els comments on SSC discussion: "bicameral reasoning", epistemology, and scope insensitivity - Less Wrong Discussion

6 Post author: tog 27 May 2015 05:08AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (4)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 28 May 2015 07:24:28PM 1 point [-]

Yeah, but if my mom's parents were on one side of the fence, that would make it less likely for her to hop to the other side, right? She did seem like she thought the democrats were probably right about some things, but that those things were dwarfed by the larger issue. So I'm still mostly convinced this instance was a lack of scope insensitivity.

it just means that said people are engaging in motivated cognition to come up with reasonable-sounding arguments to support the same conclusions as their peers.

Ah yes, good point. I'm guilty too, haha. A few years ago I engaged in some motivated cognition to convince myself there were solid secular reasons to oppose gay marriage, since everyone I knew and respected was against it even though they claimed to believe in the separation of church and state.