You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

gjm comments on Open Thread, Jun. 1 - Jun. 7, 2015 - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: Gondolinian 01 June 2015 12:45AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (203)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: gjm 01 June 2015 11:31:21AM 5 points [-]

k log n is the number of bits it takes to represent a random sequence of k elements from S. So f(S) is the number of bits one can remember when they're encoded as sequences of elements of S.

My guess is that f(S) will be smaller when n is very small (it's not twice as easy to remember 20 digits from {0,1} as to remember 10 from {0,1,2,3}, unless perhaps you explicitly convert them) and maybe when n is rather large (as it starts to require cognitive effort to distinguish elements of S). It will surely also depend in complicated ways on what sort of thing is in S (words? common first names? photos of faces? ...).

I'm sure there's been work on this in the context of computer security -- looking for things that are a bit like passwords but make a better memorability/bits-of-security tradeoff than passwords do. In that context it's also worth considering what happens if you allow the sequence to be remembered slightly wrongly.