= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
ChristianKl comments on Open Thread, Jun. 1 - Jun. 7, 2015 - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (203)
No, he referred to a 40 year old virgin in Silicon Valley. In general advancedatheist argues that young people who don't learn the requisite skills of mating when they are young don't learn them afterwards.
Where does the assumption that improving one's sex life is impossible if one already has sex come from? If you believe that sex is bad than you will have less fun with it. It becomes harder to communicate with a partner about what one desires. Plenty of women who do have sex have no orgasms.
I don't see that reference. It's possible it's been removed - the comment/post has been edited - but either way that's both still not the right age range, and a red herring anyways.
Null. Improving one's sex life requires having a sex life in the first place, the absence of which is rather central to his comment/post.
That's because you read the post without the context. This post includes the sentence "Referring to the story I linked below about the male virgins in Silicon Valley, I doubt that they wound up that way because of christian upbringings. "
That post refers to a 40 year old virgin.
Then you just contradicted yourself. You wrote "atheism is "sold" to young men and women as a way to improve their sex lives"
Ah. I see. Well, I'm not interested in winning points in a pedantry contest, so good day.