You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

philh comments on Open Thread, Jun. 8 - Jun. 14, 2015 - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: Gondolinian 08 June 2015 12:04AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (153)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: philh 08 June 2015 08:41:37AM 1 point [-]

If nothing else, we want to distinguish things that (we expect) have positive health outcomes from things that (we expect) have negative health outcomes.

Comment author: ChristianKl 09 June 2015 07:28:50AM 1 point [-]

Having sex is generally considered to be associated with positive health outcomes. The person who's having sex sorely because it's a promising health care intervention is still doing everything wrong.

Comment author: ChristianKl 09 June 2015 07:17:26AM 0 points [-]

I don't think we want to do that. It's more rational to expect both positive and negative health outcomes from most strong interventions.