You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

RowanE comments on Open Thread, Jun. 15 - Jun. 21, 2015 - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: Gondolinian 15 June 2015 12:02AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (302)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: RowanE 16 June 2015 09:19:49AM 0 points [-]

I wouldn't feel like the "meaning of life" would be answered if we turned out to be brains in vats or whatever created with a specific purpose in mind. Notwithstanding the fact that they obviously have a lot of power to punish or reward me, why should I even care what they think?

To me it seems the answer would have to be an independent ontologically basic intent, but then I'm not entirely sure I should care about even that. So a satisfactory "meaning of life" might be impossible even in principle, which I think gives a lot more credibility to the existentialists.