You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

James_Miller comments on Open Thread, Jul. 20 - Jul. 26, 2015 - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: MrMind 20 July 2015 06:55AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (202)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: James_Miller 20 July 2015 02:34:39PM 1 point [-]

Humans are also strongly influenced by culture

Or cultural variation is mostly determined by genetic variation. It's hard to empirically distinguish the two.

Comment author: ChristianKl 20 July 2015 05:32:00PM *  2 points [-]

You can do historic comparison. 500 hundred years ago people in Europe acted very differently than they do today. On the other hand their genes didn't change that much.

Comment author: RichardKennaway 21 July 2015 08:26:22AM 0 points [-]

Or cultural variation is mostly determined by genetic variation. It's hard to empirically distinguish the two.

It is even theoretically possible? If there are causal influences in both directions between X and Y, is there a meaningful way to assign relative sizes to the two directions? Especially if, as here, X and Y are each complex things consisting of many parts, and the real causal diagram consists of two large clouds and many arrows going both ways between them.