= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
ChristianKl comments on Open thread, Aug. 10 - Aug. 16, 2015 - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (283)
By that standard how about harvesting the organs of babies?
Planned Parenthood does this for aborted babies.
I think babies are more person-like than the animals we eat for food. I'm not an expert in that though. They're still above someone in a coma.
More for the "shit LW people say" collection :-)
Babies aren't sentient?
The context is that Steven Pinker arguments that animals we eat are more sentinent than babies: http://www.gargaro.com/pinker.html
What other standard do you propose?
Not harvesting the organs of living human beings?
Define living and human being.
The way the terms are defined in German law and interpreted by German courts.
which is... (trust me, I have a point here, but by not actually answering my query in a precise way your'e making it hard to make)
I answered you query in a very precise way. There are tons and tons of laws and court judgements involved and no answer that fits into a few paragraphs.
If that's the case you could try to make your point explicitly instead of implicitly. You could list your assumptions.