You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

WhyAsk comments on Open thread, Aug. 10 - Aug. 16, 2015 - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: MrMind 10 August 2015 07:29AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (283)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: WhyAsk 11 August 2015 07:21:02PM -2 points [-]

This may not be worth a new thread and in any case I don't know how to post one yet. I guess in this forum I am not yet "evolutionarily fit".

I have much evidence that people know when they are being stared at.

I have statistical evidence for the existence of ESP but I cannot find the right search terms to get similar strong evidence for this "eye beam" effect.

Can you (in the collective sense) help?

TIA.

Comment author: MrMind 12 August 2015 08:06:31AM 1 point [-]

You messed up the reply. To reply to a comment, click the baloon icon that tips "Reply" under the comment you wish to respond to, and do that for every comment: do not make another comment to the same thread grouping all the responses and inverting quotation. That is why you got heavily downvoted.

OTOH, you got downvoted here because it's common, if you want to hold an extraordinary position, to present solid evidence. Instead, you asked for help to gather strong evidence for some of your beliefs. In this case how can you say that you have much evidence for that belief? It's contradictory.

Comment author: IlyaShpitser 11 August 2015 09:42:10PM 0 points [-]

Willing to place a bet that this will not pan out in a controlled setting.

Comment author: [deleted] 13 August 2015 01:37:15PM 1 point [-]

Given my prior on ESP working, betting against it is roughly equivalent to "yes I would like some free money."

Comment author: IlyaShpitser 13 August 2015 04:04:58PM -1 points [-]

It's a little more precise: "give me money or go away."

Comment author: Tem42 11 August 2015 10:08:13PM *  1 point [-]

This site gives references to a number of studies.

EDIT: Relevant, and supports that this is a real skill.

Comment author: polymathwannabe 12 August 2015 05:16:55AM 0 points [-]

The study on the second link refers to peripheral vision, which is not ESP.

Comment author: Tem42 12 August 2015 01:52:47PM 2 points [-]

No, sorry -- it supports that you can tell when someone is staring at you, if they are within your extreme peripheral vision.

No request was made specifically for ESP.

Comment author: ChristianKl 11 August 2015 09:55:56PM 1 point [-]

I have much evidence that people know when they are being stared at.

What exactly do you mean with "evidence" and with "stared at"?

Did you run your own experiments? If so what was your setup?

Comment author: polymathwannabe 11 August 2015 09:11:34PM 0 points [-]

What statistical evidence do you have for ESP?