You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

buybuydandavis comments on Typical Sneer Fallacy - Less Wrong Discussion

10 Post author: calef 01 September 2015 03:13AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (44)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: buybuydandavis 01 September 2015 08:24:08PM 5 points [-]

"I'm going to use Joe as an example of The Bad Thing, but whether or not he actually is an example isn't the real point."

On my meta-level point, do you see how this would rankle a person's basic sense of fairness regardless of how they felt about Joe?

Comment author: calef 01 September 2015 08:34:26PM 1 point [-]

I never claimed whether he was or not wasn't Important. I just didn't focus on that aspect of the argument because it's been discussed at length elsewhere (the reddit thread, for example). And I've repeatedly offered to talk about the object level point if people were interested.

I'm not sure why someone's sense of fairness would be rankled when I directly link to essentially all of the evidence on the matter. It would be different if I was just baldly claiming "Eliezer done screwed up" without supplying any evidence.