MattG comments on Typical Sneer Fallacy - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (44)
Wait! Before we invent more needless jargon, can we just call this defensiveness?
You're right that defensiveness comes from assuming someone disagreeing with you is a status attack (which it many times is) and therefore leads to you not taking it seriously (which is often the wrong thing to do).
However, I suspect this is a deeply ingrained behaviour in humans, and not just the result of learning.
I disagree. I think we should name it after an obscure deity, and anthropomorphize the effect.
"Hey, I was just offering constructive feedback. Looks like you're being influenced by Azazel again."
Perhaps I'm just exceptionally obtuse, but it's not clear to me whether this is a serious suggestion or poking fun at those who do this (Eliezer with Azathoth, Scott with Moloch, neoreactionaries with Cthulhu, etc.).
(I think on balance it would be a bad idea, but it doesn't seem crazy enough that I'd be poking fun at it, nor brilliant enough that I can't imagine others doing so.)