You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

MattG comments on Typical Sneer Fallacy - Less Wrong Discussion

10 Post author: calef 01 September 2015 03:13AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (44)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: [deleted] 02 September 2015 01:47:45AM 7 points [-]

Wait! Before we invent more needless jargon, can we just call this defensiveness?

You're right that defensiveness comes from assuming someone disagreeing with you is a status attack (which it many times is) and therefore leads to you not taking it seriously (which is often the wrong thing to do).

However, I suspect this is a deeply ingrained behaviour in humans, and not just the result of learning.

Comment author: moridinamael 02 September 2015 02:09:49AM 2 points [-]

I disagree. I think we should name it after an obscure deity, and anthropomorphize the effect.

"Hey, I was just offering constructive feedback. Looks like you're being influenced by Azazel again."

Comment author: gjm 02 September 2015 11:15:41AM 3 points [-]

Perhaps I'm just exceptionally obtuse, but it's not clear to me whether this is a serious suggestion or poking fun at those who do this (Eliezer with Azathoth, Scott with Moloch, neoreactionaries with Cthulhu, etc.).

(I think on balance it would be a bad idea, but it doesn't seem crazy enough that I'd be poking fun at it, nor brilliant enough that I can't imagine others doing so.)