You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

calef comments on Typical Sneer Fallacy - Less Wrong Discussion

10 Post author: calef 01 September 2015 03:13AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (44)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: calef 03 September 2015 11:28:28PM *  1 point [-]

What precisely is Eliezer basically correct about on the physics?

It is true that non-unitary gates allow you to break physics in interesting ways. It is absolutely not true that violating conservation of energy will lead to a nonunitary gate. Eliezer even eventually admits (or at least admits that he 'may have misunderstood') an error in the physics here. (see this subthread).

This isn't really a minor physics mistake. Unitarity really has nothing at all to do with energy conservation.

Comment author: Douglas_Knight 04 September 2015 12:54:14AM 0 points [-]

By that standard of admission, "Gauss the Sane" admitted that Eliezer was correct.

I was very vague because I was not interested in engaging with you.

Comment author: calef 04 September 2015 01:12:47AM 0 points [-]

If you aren't interested in engaging with me, then why did you respond to my thread? Especially when the content of your post seems to be "No you're wrong, and I don't want to explain why I think so."?

Comment author: Douglas_Knight 04 September 2015 01:37:30AM 0 points [-]

It is important to make disagreements common knowledge. That would justify a comment of the form you suggest. That is, however, not the comment I left.