You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Lumifer comments on Open thread, Sep. 14 - Sep. 20, 2015 - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: MrMind 14 September 2015 07:10AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (192)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Lumifer 18 September 2015 01:57:03AM *  7 points [-]

It's a pretext, sure. That's the point.

I think there's a deeper point: human interactions are multilayered and the surface layer does not necessarily carry the most important meaning. The meaning can be -- and often is -- masked by something else which should not be interpreted literally.

"It's a false pretext" is not even wrong -- it's just not a correct way to think about the situation. A "pretext" is a way to express in a socially acceptable fashion a deliberately ambiguous meaning which, if said explicitly aloud, would change the dynamics of the situation completely.

Human interaction, especially of a sexual nature, just is not reducible to the straightforward exchange of "wanna fuck?" information bits.