For a better simulation of the interocular trauma from actual climate data, I did the same as above but after finding the best "hiatus" in the 55-year data I extended the data on the left (same ramp, same-distribution white noise) to give us 55 years with that "hiatus" at the end. Here are the results:

I reckon that numbers 4,5,7,8,9,10,12 are about as impressive as the "hiatus" in the actual data. That's just over half.