You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

RichardKennaway comments on Open thread, Oct. 5 - Oct. 11, 2015 - Less Wrong Discussion

7 Post author: MrMind 05 October 2015 06:50AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (346)
Tags: open_thread

Comments (346)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: RichardKennaway 15 October 2015 09:43:57AM 2 points [-]

Like the data on the relationship between sex and intelligence. The data on the relationship between how many men a women has had sex with and her ability to participate in future stable relationships.

In that case, you are talking about posteriors, not priors, and there is no need for the Bayes jargon. Beliefs, conclusions, from whatever sources and methods it may have been. "Bayes" is not a Power Word: Stun.

Of course, it's still prior to looking at the person in front of you and observing them.

Comment author: Lumifer 15 October 2015 03:05:05PM 2 points [-]

"Bayes" is not a Power Word: Stun.

It is, however, often used to fill in the phase 2 in the underpants gnomes business plan.

Comment author: VoiceOfRa 15 October 2015 08:23:52PM 3 points [-]

Of course, it's still prior to looking at the person in front of you and observing them.

Good, I see you are making progress in understanding this.

Comment author: RichardKennaway 18 October 2015 11:05:56AM 0 points [-]

I hope that one day I will be able to say the same of you.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit