You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Gleb_Tsipursky comments on “Be A Superdonor!”: Promoting Effective Altruism by Appealing to the Heart - Less Wrong Discussion

8 Post author: Gleb_Tsipursky 09 November 2015 06:20PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (82)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Gleb_Tsipursky 11 November 2015 06:19:05PM -1 points [-]

Using the term marketing scum is a bit pejorative, I hope we can agree on that :-) Let's avoid emotionally-loaded terms when having rational discourse - I suggest tabooing that term.

Regardless of the term used, yes, I am a dedicated consequentialist, and my goal is to get people to care about effective giving, to avoid leaving huge sums on the table.

Comment author: Lumifer 11 November 2015 06:24:48PM 1 point [-]

Let's avoid emotionally-loaded terms

But... but... but... what about "appealing to the heart"? :-P

Comment author: Gleb_Tsipursky 11 November 2015 06:40:01PM -1 points [-]

I'd be happy to taboo that as well, if you'd like ;-)

Comment author: Dagon 12 November 2015 03:39:00PM 0 points [-]

Wait. Is your goal to get people to care about effective giving, or is your goal to get people to give effectively? "to avoid leaving huge sums on the table" implies the latter.

This question seems to be the crux of the discussion. Whether EA as a movement has an important identity and mission that's not just "improve the measured state of being of many people on a relatively short timeframe".

Comment author: Gleb_Tsipursky 12 November 2015 09:14:45PM -1 points [-]

My goal is to get people to care about effective giving. This will then lead to people giving effectively. However, the first is the goal I am pursuing most directly.