VincentYu comments on Open thread, Nov. 30 - Dec. 06, 2015 - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (104)
Nice paper.
p. 558 (Study 4):
It's strange not to say why the data will not be considered further. The data are available, the reduction is clean, but the keys look a bit too skeletal given that copies of the orignal surveys don't seem to be available (perhaps because Raven's APM and possibly some other scales are copyrighted). Still, it's great of the journal and the authors to provide the data. Anyway, I'll take a look.
The supplement contains the statements and the corresponding descriptive statistics for their profundity ratings. It's an entertaining read.
ETA: For additional doses of profundity, use Armok_GoB's profound LW wisdom generator.