You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Slider comments on Engineering Religion - Less Wrong Discussion

2 Post author: KevinGrant 07 December 2015 01:34PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (32)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Slider 07 December 2015 11:58:52PM 1 point [-]

One way of defining things is when you inherently let signifcant parts of your life be dictated by trust. Normally there are requirements to earning trust such as being good in a field of knowledge to be able to function as a expert regarding such subject allowing others to skip details.

You can obvoiusly enter into dynamics that other dynamics are not allowed to move into such easily. Science or courts need some level of proof. Military power is dependent on weapon production economies. If you just trust it will be a good thing if you do it you don't need any of those complications.

For example a trust based approach to prisoners dilemma can just have the players cooperate while agents wanting to be game theorethically competent must make up all kinds of excuses to cooperate or suffer contraoperation.