= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
MrMind comments on Open Thread, Dec. 28 - Jan. 3, 2016 - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (144)
There was an ancient thread about sort of "extremely politically incorrect ideas that were nonetheless true", and there I noticed that one of such idea was that walls were effective at segregating people.
It would be interesting to see if hoverbikes and the like will be purchased even by the poorest, thereby eliminating barriers against immigration and segregation.
It's not a practical workaround. A slowly-moving airborne target is very shootable.
It surely is, but then you have to step from passive to active surveillance. But who knows, maybe in the future we'll have automatic turrets shooting at flying immigrants.
The hoverbikes at the link cannot carry people (although it's likely enough that this will one day be possible.)
There are images on the website with a person on the drone and the drone being in the air. The problem for human usage is safety.
If you want one person to fly for limited distances, there are many alternatives.