You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Gunnar_Zarncke comments on Open Thread, January 4-10, 2016 - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: polymathwannabe 04 January 2016 01:06PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (430)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Gunnar_Zarncke 05 January 2016 02:40:37PM 0 points [-]

I did look up Wikipedia on population ethics and considered

"the theory of when one state of affairs is better than another, where the states of affairs may differ over the number of people who ever live".

to be matching if you generalize by substitution of "number of people" with "well-being of people".

But I admit that politics

the practice and theory of influencing other people. Politics involves the making of a common decision for a group of people a uniform decision applying in the same way to all members of the group

contains a matching with choosing among available actions in a group for the benefit of the group. The main difference to what I meant (ahem) is that politics describes the real thing with unequal power whereas population ethics prescribes independent of the decision makers power.