If people's beliefs cluster, then there must be a common cause of the beliefs. One possible cause is politics. But you left out another potential common cause, somewhere between your (b) and (c), which is that there is some single factual belief which causes the large number of specific factual beliefs, which, in turn, cause politics.
This is related to the existence of a left-right political spectrum. Why is politics one dimensional? Many people say that this is the result of the two party system, forcing people into coalitions. Do people wind up with factual beliefs supporting their entire party platform, including coalition partners whose interests are not the same as their own? If parties are coalitions, you might expect different coalitions in different countries. Correlations between factual beliefs might switch between countries. But I do not think this happens. And many countries, like Germany, have proportional representation systems that do not require parties to be large coalitions. Yet German politics seems pretty one-dimensional to me.
Why is politics one dimensional? Many people say that this is the result of the two party system, forcing people into coalitions.
I believe it's the other way round. People were dividing others to "us" and "them" long before political parties were invented.
I'd say that "us" and "them" is hardcoded in people. We also have a bias to imagine that all our enemies are in some sense the same (so there is only one "them", instead of "them1", "them2", "them3"...) Most people are prob...
Here is a new paper of mine (12 pages) on suspicious agreement between belief and values. The idea is that if your empirical beliefs systematically support your values, then that is evidence that you arrived at those beliefs through a biased belief-forming process. This is especially so if those beliefs concern propositions which aren’t probabilistically correlated with each other, I argue.
I have previously written several LW posts on these kinds of arguments (here and here; see also mine and ClearerThinking’s political bias test) but here the analysis is more thorough. See also Thrasymachus' recent post on the same theme.