You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

helldalgo comments on A Rationalist Guide to OkCupid - Less Wrong Discussion

25 Post author: Jacobian 03 February 2016 08:50PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (66)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: LessWrong 04 February 2016 04:06:17PM *  0 points [-]

Facebook friends are a non-think button press or in other words, pretty much nothing (unless you keep in contact, and in that case they're just friends)

My idea for the next incidentgate is (and seems kinda silly when typing it) "Hi I remember you from HS and always thought you were kinda cute but I was too shy to talk, would you like to meet up sometime?"

PEDANT EDIT: There's also a few girls from middle school before I moved, (Same city, different school)

Comment author: helldalgo 04 February 2016 04:14:05PM *  0 points [-]

Also, I might want to have a short introductory conversation before that message. Don't feel like this should be copied word for word, but something like this:

You: "Hey, how's it going?"

Her: "Hello! It's going well!"

You: "I saw [recent mention or post about something relevant to both your interests, non-sexual]. [Comment on thing, keep it positive]."

Her: "[response]."

THEN maybe the high school message. Again: autism. So don't take my advice as the pinnacle of social skills. :)

Comment author: LessWrong 04 February 2016 04:52:18PM *  1 point [-]

It looks like a conversation with a person I haven't talked to in something that isn't either long enough for them to forget about me or someone close I haven't talked to in some time.

But let's be pedantic and you'll probably like this or the autism stereotypes aren't true, here's a few scenarios:

  1. Girl I know to a good degree, will probably recall me if I say hi
  2. Girl I barely interacted with but might recall me
  3. Girl I only saw at school breaks, might not remember me

Your example will probably work on category 1. Category 2 MIGHT go along, although a simple hi is rather generic and therefore is more of a lottery bet than a sure bet. I can't tell how category 3 will respond, but probably not better than category 2.

Consider how you'd feel about the introductory messages if you were from each of those scenarios.

We could also dive into sub-scenarios, tailored to specific optimisations or lack of them. Such as my fashion choices, how I live, people I hang out with, etc. Although it's dubious how much they matter since all of this is my unresearched model in my head about online messaging.

Comment author: helldalgo 04 February 2016 05:10:07PM 0 points [-]

You are correct, (some of) the autism stereotypes are true in my case!

  1. I would respond very positively.
  2. Maybe
  3. I would respond positively, but would first inquire about who you are.