You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

polymathwannabe comments on Open Thread, Feb 8 - Feb 15, 2016 - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: Elo 08 February 2016 04:47AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (215)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Clarity 08 February 2016 07:39:39AM *  1 point [-]

imputed value to smokers, as measured by the amount they're willing to pay, greater still.

Inferring preferences of addicts by 'revealed preference', that is, what they are willing to pay, is methodologically inadequate. They are characteristically time-inconsistent (to behavioural economists) or dynamically inconsistent (to game theorists)

The economic value to employees is likely much larger

I don't rate the economic empowerment of tobacco industry employees particularly highly. I doubt they're ethical consumers if they're such unethical producers.

edit: if you're interested see this:

The near-universal experience of regret among smokers in four countries: Findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Survey.

cohort of over 8000 adult smokers....The proportion of smokers who agreed or agreed strongly with the statement “If you had to do it over again, you would not have started smoking” was extremely high—about 90%—and nearly identical across the four countries.

Comment author: polymathwannabe 08 February 2016 04:50:33PM -1 points [-]

Addicted consumers cannot make free choices. This makes several economic assumptions collapse when they're used to try to analyze drug consumption.