You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Lumifer comments on Open Thread Feb 22 - Feb 28, 2016 - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: Elo 21 February 2016 09:14PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (228)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Lumifer 24 February 2016 08:35:50PM 0 points [-]

If you don't think that evolution describes the changes in the population of mitochondria in a cell, then I think you're taking an overly narrow view of evolution!

That may well be so, but still in the context of this discussion I don't think that it's useful to describe the changes in the population of mitochondria in an evolutionary framework (your lower level, that is).

happen to be male; none of my mitochondria will make it to the next human generation anyway.

Unless you have a sister :-) Yes, I know that mDNA is special.

The answer is twofold:

There is also the third option: symbiosis. If you managed to get your hooks into a nice and juicy host, it might be wise to set up house instead of doing the slash-and-burn.

Since this started connected to economics, there are probably parallels with roving bandits and stationary bandits.