You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

gjm comments on Rationality Quotes April 2016 - Less Wrong Discussion

1 Post author: bbleeker 06 April 2016 07:01AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (58)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Brillyant 06 April 2016 09:18:46PM 0 points [-]

In my experience, most U.S. Evangelical Christians boil the basis of salvation down to one's response to Jesus' death and resurrection. You have to believe in it or at least say you believe in it. That's about it. It's relatively easy redemption.

Almost everything else seems increasingly negotiable and thought to be not worth arguing about.

This seems to me to be a response to the proliferation of "knotty theological problems" to the masses via the internet. It would bog down the movement to worry about whether Job was a real person or whether or not Obama is the really the Antichrist based on Revelation X:XX. It has the potential to fracture the sect and it's just plain a buzzkill to dwell on such minutiae.

Better to just Believe in Jesus™ and sort out the details posthumously when you're hanging out in your BRAND NEW MANSION!

Comment author: gjm 06 April 2016 09:49:12PM 0 points [-]

most U.S. Evangelical Christians

Yup. Most evangelical Christians elsewhere, too, at least in principle (I suspect the reward-and-punishment view of salvation and damnation is hard to eradicate altogether). But evangelical Christians are not the only Christians, and in 12th-century England -- the setting for the quotation above -- there were no evangelicals as such.

This seems to me to be a response [...]

If you mean the original quotation: no, it's set in the 12th century. If you mean the belief among evangelicals that salvation is dependent on faith and affiliation rather than on good versus bad actions: no, that's been central to evangelicalism since evangelicalism existed, and widely believed by Protestants since Protestantism existed. (I'm not sure about the history of the idea pre-Reformation, but I bet it cropped up from time to time.)