You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Elo comments on Open thread, Apr. 18 - Apr. 24, 2016 - Less Wrong Discussion

2 Post author: MrMind 18 April 2016 07:19AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (176)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: MrMind 20 April 2016 08:32:45AM *  3 points [-]

Some time ago there has been a post (or a comment?) arguing against the tendency of not answering the questions one poses directly. Say for example: "Can you recommend me a book about virtue ethics?" being answered mostly by "Here's why virtue ethics is wrong" (this is a fictional example, it was not in the original post).

The discussion hit me deeply because from that time on I've noticed doing the same behavior a lot, and I've tried to correct myself with mixed success.

I've come to realize that there's a symmetryc 'bias' (it's not really a cognitive bias, more like a cognitive quirk): answering questions too literally. For example:
- Can you reccomend me a book about rationality?
- The one I liked the most is Rationality: from AI to zombie.
[some times pass]
- Hey, you know about the book you recommended me? I've found a blog that contains almost exactly the same contents: it's called LessWrong!
- Yes, I know, it's five years I've been reading it.
- Why didn't you said that?
- Because you asked me for a book
- [grumbles]

Comment author: Elo 21 April 2016 02:18:54AM 1 point [-]

strike to the heart of the question, not to defeat it. I plan to write it still. finding time appears to be difficult.