You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Lumifer comments on Is the average ethical review board ethical from an utilitarian standpoint? - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: ChristianKl 27 April 2016 12:11PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (23)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Lumifer 27 April 2016 02:50:36PM 3 points [-]

the study is unethical because the users didn't consent to being manipulated and studied in this fashion

That makes all A/B testing unethical.

Comment author: OrphanWilde 27 April 2016 02:55:16PM -1 points [-]

Not all; presumptively, it is possible to give informed consent. But unless the testers do give informed consent, under this principle, yes, it would be unethical.

(I do not agree with this principle for the reasons I already cited: experimentation doesn't confer unique ethical qualities to behavior, the ethical qualities are inherent in the behavior itself, and the general rules about experimentation were exported from medicine where the behaviors involved do have more questionable ethics.)