You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Lumifer comments on Open Thread June 6 - June 12, 2016 - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: Elo 06 June 2016 04:21AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (126)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Lumifer 10 June 2016 03:38:26PM 6 points [-]

Oh, dear. Psychology, can you please get your act together and stop being an embarrassing mess?

Researchers have fixed a number of papers after mistakenly reporting that people who hold conservative political beliefs are more likely to exhibit traits associated with psychoticism, such as authoritarianism and tough-mindedness.

As one of the notices specifies, now it appears that liberal political beliefs are linked with psychoticism. That paper also swapped ideologies when reporting on people higher in neuroticism and social desirability (falsely claiming that you have socially desirable qualities); the original paper said those traits are linked with liberal beliefs, but they are more common among people with conservative values.

Comment author: MrMind 13 June 2016 06:58:36AM 0 points [-]

Is this some kind of meta-psychological experiment? At least let's hope it is...

Comment author: Lumifer 13 June 2016 02:47:27PM 2 points [-]

If it is, it's about gullibility, isn't it? X-/

Comment author: Viliam 13 June 2016 09:02:23AM 2 points [-]

Maybe it's a clever way to find out political bias in academy. Write two papers claiming that one or the other side of the political spectrum is scientifically linked to insanity, submit both papers to random journals, and see which version becomes the official academic "truth".

Just kidding, but it would be an awesome experiment.