You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

ChristianKl comments on Open thread, Jul. 04 - Jul. 10, 2016 - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: MrMind 04 July 2016 07:02AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (80)
Tags: open_thread

Comments (80)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ChristianKl 06 July 2016 04:57:22PM *  0 points [-]

AlphaGo (roughly) may try many things to win at go, varieties of joseki or whatever.

I'm not sure that AlphaGo has any conception of what a joseki is supposed to be.

Moves have a certain 'go-winningness' to them (and camps full of losers forfeiting over and over has a higher go-winningness' than any), and it prefers higher. Saying that 'go-winning' isn't 'go-winning' doesn't mean anything.

Are the moves that AlphaGo played at the end of game 4 really about 'go-winningness' in the sense of what it's programmers intended 'go-winningness' to mean?

I don't think it's clear that every neural net can propagate goals through itself perfectly.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit