You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

xrchz comments on New Pascal's Mugging idea for potential solution - Less Wrong Discussion

2 Post author: kokotajlod 04 August 2016 08:38PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (18)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: xrchz 05 August 2016 11:20:27PM 2 points [-]

More specifically, it seems that your c must include information about how to interpret the X bits. Right? So it seems slightly wrong to say "R is the largest number that can be specified in X bits of information" as long as c stays fixed. c might grow as the specification scheme changes.

Alternatively, you might just be wrong in thinking that 30 bits are enough to specify 3^^^^3. If c indicates that the number of additional universes is specified by a standard binary-encoded number, 30 bits only gets you about a billion.