You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

root comments on Open Thread, Aug. 8 - Aug 14. 2016 - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: Elo 07 August 2016 11:07PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (71)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: root 12 August 2016 10:53:45AM 0 points [-]

depend on the specific person

I'm not really sure how to pinpoint individual differences. I'm going to stop here but I honestly think it would be nice to break this down further. A potentially harmful practice could be taking some sort of average ability to digest food, and then start deriving standard deviations from it. I'm saying 'harmful' because I (1) do not know how to do this and (2) I have no idea if this is the right thing to do.

Now apply this argument to the calories themselves. Is it possible that two people eat the same food, yet one of them extracts 1000 calories from the food, and the other extracts 1500 calories?

I'd imagine that people who had a less economical digestion would probably have less offspring, but that's just a guess.

Well, you have just returned my question. I was curious whether there are ways to spend calories that most people would forget to think about when thinking about "work".

It would be greatly helpful to have a list of energy spendings by the body, then. Can someone provide directions?