If it's worth saying, but not worth its own post, then it goes here.
Notes for future OT posters:
1. Please add the 'open_thread' tag.
2. Check if there is an active Open Thread before posting a new one. (Immediately before; refresh the list-of-threads page before posting.)
3. Open Threads should start on Monday, and end on Sunday.
4. Unflag the two options "Notify me of new top level comments on this article" and "
I get this moment you're having, it's obvious when we talk about a brand new science, that is neuroscience. Even if there are a lot of work still left. In relation to you, that is still a map, that you have a mind. Okay, now I might be playing on definitions if "mind" doesn't mean arational reality to you.
That's your opinion. That's your map.
A cosmic joke :D Really, though, you are the God, the Architect of the Matrix.
I fully agree. I do argue that reality cannot be described by anything, as it is arational. But of course you have to see for yourself.
No, that's quantum physics 101. Unless you're saying one of two things:
1) law of physics change for people who have different maps
2) you're just calling reality "maps that can't change", in which case there's no point in having this conversation.
If that's true, why isn't Liza sucking my c@{k right now? It's my Matrix, after all.
So how do you call tho... (read more)