Unless we stubbornly insist that liar type paradoxes are deep and mysterious...
That is my position, although I consider it being reasonable rather than stubbornly insisting that nothing can be deep and mysterious.
I think liar type paradoxes are exactly as mysterious as this Python function:
def f(): return not f()
If your intuition is like a Turing complete language, you can't insist that all functions must terminate.
If it's worth saying, but not worth its own post, then it goes here.
Notes for future OT posters:
1. Please add the 'open_thread' tag.
2. Check if there is an active Open Thread before posting a new one. (Immediately before; refresh the list-of-threads page before posting.)
3. Open Threads should start on Monday, and end on Sunday.
4. Unflag the two options "Notify me of new top level comments on this article" and "